Ependymoma
Ependymoma | |
---|---|
Diagnosis in short | |
Ependymoma grade II WHO. H&E stain | |
| |
LM | Perivascular pseudorosettes, ependymal rosettes |
Subtypes | Tanycytic, Clear cell, Papillary, Cellular |
LM DDx | Subependymoma, Glioblastoma, Pilocytic astrocytoma, Oligodendroglioma |
IHC | GFAP +ve |
Prognosis | intermediate to poor (WHO Grades II & III) |
Ependymoma is a neuropathology tumour.
General
- Called the forgotten glial tumour.
- Anatomic location and molecular data is essential for tumor diagnosis.
Epidemiology:[1]
- Usual site:
- Adults: usually spinal cord.
- Children: usually posterior fossa.
- May be associated with neurofibromatosis type 2.
There are currently eight main ependymal tumors:[2]
- Supratentorial ependymoma, ZFTA-fusion positive
- Supratentorial ependymoma, YAP1-fusion positive
- Posterior fossa ependymoma group A
- Posterior fossa ependymoma group B
- Spinal ependymoma
- Spinal ependymoma, MYCN-amplified
- Myxopapillary ependymoma
- Subependymoma
Ependymoma, NOS (not otherwise specified): Molecular analysis still missing. Ependymoma, NEC (not elsewhere classfied): Tumor cannot assigned to any of the defined entities.
Note: Molecularly defined ependymomas can be still graded as CNS grade 2 or 3 depending on histological features.
- Depreceated terminologies:
Gross
- Usually discrete and enhancing.
- Ventricular location, but also within the spinal cord.
- Dissemination possible.
- Myxopapillary ependymoma classically at filum terminale.
- Subependymoma typically seen in IVth ventricle.
Microscopic
"Classic" ependymoma
- Come in two CNS WHO grades: 2 and 3.
- Usu. sharply demarcated from surrounding brain parenchyma.
Features:
- Cells have a "tadpole-like" morphology.
- May also be described as ice cream cone-shaped.[5]
- Rosettes = circular nuclear free zones/cells arranged in a pseudoglandular fashion; comes in two flavours in ependymoma:
- Perivascular pseudorosettes = (tumour) cells arranged around a blood vessel; nuclei of cells distant from the blood vessel, i.e. rim of cytoplasm (from tumour cells) surround blood vessel (nucleus-free zone); more common than ependymal rosette... but less specific.
- Ependymal rosette (AKA true ependymal rosette) = rosette has an empty space at the centre - key feature.
- Nuclear features monotonous, i.e. "boring".[6]
- There is little variation in size, shape and staining.
- Hyalinized vessels.
- Calcification.
- Rare cases with cartilagineous metaplasia.[7]
- Branching capillaries usu. only in supratentorial ependymomas.
DDx (supratentorial and posterior fossa ependymoma):
- Subependymoma.
- Glioblastoma (GBM).
- Gliomas with BCOR internal tandem duplication.
- Astroblastoma, MN1-altered.
- Invasive border = GBM; circumscribed border of lesion = ependymoma.
- Oligodendroglioma (Clear cell ependymoma))
DDx (spinal ependymoma):
- Pilocytic astrocytoma (Tanycytic ependymoma)
- Diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27-altered
- Small cell glioblastoma (MYCN-amplified spinal ependymoma)
Images
www:
- Ependymoma (flickr.com).
- Ependymoma - ependymal rosettes (ajnr.org).
- Anaplastic ependymoma - case 1 (upmc.edu).
- Anaplastic ependymoma - case 2 (upmc.edu).
Tanycytic morphology in ependymoma must not confused with pilocytic astrocytoma. (WC/jensflorian)
Clear cell morphology in ependymoma may mimic oligodendroglioma. (WC/jensflorian)
Grading
Easy:
- Subependymoma = CNS WHO grade 1.
- Myxopapillary ependymoma = CNS WHO grade 2.
Not so easy: All other ependymomas: WHO CNS Grade 2 vs. Grade 3 depends on:
- Cellular density.
- Mitoses (no clear cut-off).
- Necrosis (not prognostic).
- Microvascular proliferation.
- Poor interobserver reliability[8]
Notes:
- Many tumours fall between grade 2 and grade 3.
- Rare cases with sarcomatous or cartilaginous components.[9][10]
IHC
- Reticulin-ve.
- GFAP+ve.
- MIB1 (usu low).
- IDH-1-ve.
- EMA (dots and rings).[11]
- Widespread and strong EMA expression is indicative of YAP1-fused ependymoma.
- Olig2-ve.[12]
- H3K27me3 nuclear loss in Posterior fossa group A ependymoma (nuclear loss is diagnostic).[13]
- L1CAM in supratentorial tumors (expression indicates ZFTA fusion).[14]
- p65 nuclear +ve in ZFTA-fused ependymoma.
Molecular
Two distinct molecular subgroups exist in the posterior fossa:[15]
- Group A ependymomas:
- Group B ependymomas:
- typically adults.
- midline.
- relatively favorable clinical outcomes.
- gene expression profiles similar to that of spinal cord ependymomas.
- increased Chromosomal 1q gains. [18]
Supratentorial ependymomas have also a distinct profile:
- 70 % of these ependymomas are ZFTA-fusion positive and have recurrent gene fusions mostly involving RELA[19]
- EPHB2 amplifications and CDKN2A deletions in a subset of these tumors[20]
- 6-8% are YAP1-fusion positive, mostly MAMLD1 as fusion partner.
Note: Molecular subgroups have no treatment implications (at the moment).
See also
References
- ↑ Kumar, Vinay; Abbas, Abul K.; Fausto, Nelson; Aster, Jon (2009). Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease (8th ed.). Elsevier Saunders. pp. 1334. ISBN 978-1416031215.
- ↑ The International Agency for Research on Cancer (Editors: Louis, D.N.; Ohgaki, H.; Wiestler, O.D.; Cavenee, W.K.) (2007). Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Tumors of the Central Nervous System (IARC WHO Classification of Tumours) (4th ed.). Lyon: World Health Organization. pp. 74. doi:10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4. ISBN 978-9283224303.
- ↑ Parker, M.; Mohankumar, KM.; Punchihewa, C.; Weinlich, R.; Dalton, JD.; Li, Y.; Lee, R.; Tatevossian, RG. et al. (Feb 2014). "C11orf95-RELA fusions drive oncogenic NF-κB signalling in ependymoma.". Nature 506 (7489): 451-5. doi:10.1038/nature13109. PMID 24553141.
- ↑ Pietsch, T.; Wohlers, I.; Goschzik, T.; Dreschmann, V.; Denkhaus, D.; Dörner, E.; Rahmann, S.; Klein-Hitpass, L. (Apr 2014). "Supratentorial ependymomas of childhood carry C11orf95-RELA fusions leading to pathological activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway.". Acta Neuropathol 127 (4): 609-11. doi:10.1007/s00401-014-1264-4. PMID 24562983.
- ↑ http://www.pathology.vcu.edu/WirSelfInst/tumor-2.html
- ↑ MUN. 6 Oct 2009.
- ↑ Wang, X.; Zhang, S.; Ye, Y.; Chen, Y.; Liu, X. (Jul 2012). "Ependymoma with cartilaginous metaplasia might have more aggressive behavior: a case report and literature review.". Brain Tumor Pathol 29 (3): 172-6. doi:10.1007/s10014-011-0079-4. PMID 22228122.
- ↑ Ellison, DW.; Kocak, M.; Figarella-Branger, D.; Felice, G.; Catherine, G.; Pietsch, T.; Frappaz, D.; Massimino, M. et al. (May 2011). "Histopathological grading of pediatric ependymoma: reproducibility and clinical relevance in European trial cohorts.". J Negat Results Biomed 10: 7. doi:10.1186/1477-5751-10-7. PMID 21627842.
- ↑ Vajtai, I.; Kuhlen, D.; Kappeler, A.; Mariani, L.; Zimmermann, A.; Paulus, W. (Jul 2010). "Rapid spontaneous malignant progression of supratentorial tanycytic ependymoma with sarcomatous features - "Ependymosarcoma".". Pathol Res Pract 206 (7): 493-8. doi:10.1016/j.prp.2009.07.013. PMID 19853384.
- ↑ Boukas, A.; Joshi, A.; Jenkins, A.; Holliman, D. (2013). "Extensive cartilaginous metaplasia of recurrent posterior fossa ependymoma: case report and review of the literature.". Pediatr Neurosurg 49 (2): 93-8. doi:10.1159/000356931. PMID 24401698.
- ↑ Hasselblatt, M.; Paulus, W. (Oct 2003). "Sensitivity and specificity of epithelial membrane antigen staining patterns in ependymomas.". Acta Neuropathol 106 (4): 385-8. doi:10.1007/s00401-003-0752-8. PMID 12898159.
- ↑ Švajdler, M.; Rychlý, B.; Mezencev, R.; Fröhlichová, L.; Bednárová, A.; Pataky, F.; Daum, O. (Jan 2016). "SOX10 and Olig2 as negative markers for the diagnosis of ependymomas: An immunohistochemical study of 98 glial tumors.". Histol Histopathol 31 (1): 95-102. doi:10.14670/HH-11-654. PMID 26287936.
- ↑ Panwalkar, P.; Clark, J.; Ramaswamy, V.; Hawes, D.; Yang, F.; Dunham, C.; Yip, S.; Hukin, J. et al. (Jul 2017). "Immunohistochemical analysis of H3K27me3 demonstrates global reduction in group-A childhood posterior fossa ependymoma and is a powerful predictor of outcome.". Acta Neuropathol. doi:10.1007/s00401-017-1752-4. PMID 28733933.
- ↑ Parker, M.; Mohankumar, KM.; Punchihewa, C.; Weinlich, R.; Dalton, JD.; Li, Y.; Lee, R.; Tatevossian, RG. et al. (Feb 2014). "C11orf95-RELA fusions drive oncogenic NF-κB signalling in ependymoma.". Nature 506 (7489): 451-5. doi:10.1038/nature13109. PMID 24553141.
- ↑ Witt, H.; Mack, SC.; Ryzhova, M.; Bender, S.; Sill, M.; Isserlin, R.; Benner, A.; Hielscher, T. et al. (Aug 2011). "Delineation of two clinically and molecularly distinct subgroups of posterior fossa ependymoma.". Cancer Cell 20 (2): 143-57. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2011.07.007. PMID 21840481.
- ↑ Mack, SC.; Witt, H.; Piro, RM.; Gu, L.; Zuyderduyn, S.; Stütz, AM.; Wang, X.; Gallo, M. et al. (Feb 2014). "Epigenomic alterations define lethal CIMP-positive ependymomas of infancy.". Nature 506 (7489): 445-50. doi:10.1038/nature13108. PMID 24553142.
- ↑ Panwalkar, P.; Clark, J.; Ramaswamy, V.; Hawes, D.; Yang, F.; Dunham, C.; Yip, S.; Hukin, J. et al. (Jul 2017). "Immunohistochemical analysis of H3K27me3 demonstrates global reduction in group-A childhood posterior fossa ependymoma and is a powerful predictor of outcome.". Acta Neuropathol. doi:10.1007/s00401-017-1752-4. PMID 28733933.
- ↑ Korshunov, A.; Witt, H.; Hielscher, T.; Benner, A.; Remke, M.; Ryzhova, M.; Milde, T.; Bender, S. et al. (Jul 2010). "Molecular staging of intracranial ependymoma in children and adults.". J Clin Oncol 28 (19): 3182-90. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.27.3359. PMID 20516456.
- ↑ Parker, M.; Mohankumar, KM.; Punchihewa, C.; Weinlich, R.; Dalton, JD.; Li, Y.; Lee, R.; Tatevossian, RG. et al. (Feb 2014). "C11orf95-RELA fusions drive oncogenic NF-κB signalling in ependymoma.". Nature 506 (7489): 451-5. doi:10.1038/nature13109. PMID 24553141.
- ↑ Philip-Hollingsworth, S.; Hollingsworth, RI.; Dazzo, FB. (Jan 1989). "Host-range related structural features of the acidic extracellular polysaccharides of Rhizobium trifolii and Rhizobium leguminosarum.". J Biol Chem 264 (3): 1461-6. PMID 2912966.