Difference between revisions of "Cytopathology"
m (→Bone marrow/vertebrae: +link) |
m (→Prepartions) |
||
Line 357: | Line 357: | ||
! Cost | ! Cost | ||
! Cells required | ! Cells required | ||
! Fixation | ! [[Fixation]] | ||
! Disadvantages/problems | ! Disadvantages/problems | ||
|- | |- |
Revision as of 21:09, 5 January 2011
Cytopathology, often called cytology, is the study of pathologic changes in cells.
It is often divided into gynecologic and non-gynecologic. Gynecologic in this context usually refers to Pap test specimens, i.e. uterine cervix, vaginal vault; other gynecologic specimens are considered non-gynecologic.
Slide-marking conventions
Conventions are important for facilitating communication between various team members.
Common conventions:[1]
- The slide is placed with the label on the right hand side.
- "Marks-of-interest", e.g. dots, are place above the field of interest (when viewed through a microscope - that does not correct for image inversion).
- Microscopes used for surgical pathology, generally, do not correct for image inversion.
- The "marks-of-interest" appear below the field of interest when the slide is viewed with the naked eye.
- Microscopes used for surgical pathology, generally, do not correct for image inversion.
Marks-of-interest:
- Dot - region of interest.
- Inverted "V" - transformation zone (in cervical cytology specimen).
- Inverted "Y" - benign finding.
Notes:
- Image inversion in the microscope comes about as light travels in a straight line.
- Marks should draw attention to the best examples of the highest grade lesion present.
- More than 7 marks on slide is generally considered excessive.
Dictums of cytopathology
- Malignant cells are malignant because they have malignant features.
- Benign cells are benign because they lack malignant features and have benign features.
Corollaries:
- Cells lacking malignant features are not malignant.
- Cells lacking benign features are not malignant.
Cytologic features of malignancy
Cytologic features of malignancy:
- High nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio.
- Nuclear membrane irregularities.
- Notches/sharp discontinuities.
- Chromatin abnormalities.
- Clumped chromatin, esp. differences between quadrants of a nucleus.
- Chromatin clumping at the nuclear membrane (chromatin margination).
- Hyperchromatic nucleus (when compared to other cells).
- Nuclear pleomorphism (comparison of neighbouring cells).
- Def'n: variable staining, shape, and size.
Notes:
- Not all features of malignancy will be present in one cell.[2]
Cell types
WG's cell typing guide:[3]
Nucleus location | Nucleus shape | Cytoplasm | Chromatin | Nucleoli | Other | Architecture | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Squamous | Center | Oval/Spindle | Solid/dense | Coarse | Absent | Squamous pearls, streaming | Streaming |
Secretory/ glandular (adenocarcinoma) |
Eccentric | Oval | Vacuoles | Fine | Present | Columnar | Acini (glandular structures), (true) papillae |
Neuroendocrine | Center (?) | Oval | Fine granules (neuroendocrine granules - seen on Romanowsky type stains) |
Reticulated "stippled" | Absent | Perinuclear blue bodies (not seen in lymphoid cells) |
Clusters, may appear dyscohesive |
Lymphoid | Eccentric | Oval | Very scant, basophilic | Coarse | Usually absent | Lymphoglandular bodies, dyscohesive |
Single cells |
Germ cell | Central/variable | Oval | Variable | Variable | (?), present in seminoma | Tigroid background in seminoma (Romanowsky stains) |
Usu. in clusters |
Mesenchymal | Central | Spindle | (?) | Fine (?) | Absent | Variable | Clusters, streaming |
Vacuoles
Hydropic vacuoles and secretory vacuoles:[4]
Contents | Distorts nucleus | Significance | |
---|---|---|---|
Hydropic vacuole | Empty (clear) | Less common | Dying cell |
Secretory vacuole | "Globs" of stuff (usu. pink) | More common | Secretory cell/consider adenocarcinoma |
Notes:
- Size the vacuole is not discriminative.[5]
- Nuclear distortion (by the vacuole) is probably the strongest indicator the vacuole is secretory.
Subtyping adenocarcinoma
Adenocarcinoma can be subtyped:[6]
Architecture | Group borders | Group cellular/nuclear pleomorphism | Vacuoles (cytoplasmic) | Nucleoli | Other | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Serous carcinoma | Micropapillae | Knobby | Marked size variation, +/-second benign pop. | Hydropic | Large, red | Psammoma bodies |
Gastric (signet ring) carcinoma | Single cells, groups | Community border (?) | Limited, cells uniform, +/-second benign pop. | Mucin | Usu. inconspicuous | - |
Breast ductal carcinoma | Clusters (tubular) | Community border | Limited, cells uniform, +/-second benign pop. | Mucin | Inconspicuous/small | - |
Adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified (NOS) | 3-D clusters | Community border | Limited, malignant cells uniform, +/-second benign pop. | Mucin | Inconspicuous/small | - |
Mesothelioma (see Note 1) | Clusters (usu. large), single cells | Knobby border | Usu. uniform size, one cell population | Hydropic | Often large | Intercellular windows, cytoplasmic blebs |
Note 1:
- Mesothelioma is a type of carcinoma,[7] yet is not an adenocarcinoma; it is added to the table to make the point that it is similar to adenocarcinoma.
- Mesothelioma arises from the mesothelium, a type of epithelium. Carcinomas are epithelial derived malignant tumours (by definition).
Staining
There are two standard stains:
- Papanicolaou stain (Pap stain).
- Is a modified H&E stain.
- Done on alcohol-fixed material.
- Romanowsky stain.
- Many variants exist.
- Used on air-dried specimens; air-dried cells are much larger, it is easier to see the nuclear detail.
Processing:
- Carnoy's solution (ethanol, glacial acetic acid) - used to lyze RBCs to get rid of 'em.
Further details are in the main article on staining.
Notes:
- Jörundsson et al. compare the types of stains.[8]
- Romanowsky type staining is uncommon in the Canadian cytopathology community and not on FRCPC exams.
Pap stain
Interpretation:[9]
- Blue = nucleus, basophilic cytoplasm.
- Pink = cytoplasm.
- Orange = keratin.
DDx of orange:
- Keratin.
- Dying/dead cell.
- Center of cluster effect/diffusion effect.
- The center of large clumps of cells are often artifactually pink/orange, as the eosin (a small molecule) get there but the azure (a large molecule) does not.
Romanowsky stains
Variants:
- Diff-Quik.
- Field's stain.
- May-Grünwald-Giemsa.
- Wright stain.
Interpretation (Romanowsky stain):[10]
- Red - RBCs, eosinophil granules, neuroendocrine granules.[11]
- Blue (basophilic) - lymphocyte cytoplasm.
- Purple - nuclear chromatin, neutrophil granules, platelets.
Notes:
- May have air-drying artifact.
- Usually on slide periphery.
- Appearance: white holes.
- Air-drying may mimic the appearance of nuclear pseudoinclusions.
- Cells tend to be larger than on Pap stain.
Adequacy of specimens
Standards are lacking for most types of specimens. A generally accepted standard is established only for cervical cytology specimens.
Standards (UHN) for non-gyne specimens:[12]
- Breast: >= 6 cell groups (6 cells/cluster).
- Thyroid: >= 20 cell cluster (20 cells/cluster).
- Urine: >=50 urothelial cells.
- Sputum: >= 10 pulmonary macrophages.
There is a generally accepted standard for cervical (liquid-based) cytology specimens:[13]
- >5000 squamous cells/slide, if no abnormality is present.
- If abnormal cells are present, any number of cells is acceptable.
- This works-out to approx. 4 cells/HPF.
- Where: HPF = area seen at 400X with an eye piece diameter is ~22 mm.
- 10 HPFs are counted and a table is used to see whether the sample is adequate.
- This works-out to approx. 4 cells/HPF.
- If abnormal cells are present, any number of cells is acceptable.
Note:
- The standard for conventional pap smears is: 8000-12000 squamous cells/slide.[14]
Transformation zone (TZ)
The presence of the TZ should be commented on:[15]
- An adequate TZ is 10 cells - endocervical cells or squamous metaplastic cells (per Bethesda).
Difficulties in obtaining a TZ may arise in the following populations:
- Pregnant (endocervical canal not sampled).
- Menopausal.
- Young nulliparous.
Principles of FNA
General:
- Fine needle aspiration is an oxymoron.[16]
- One does not really aspirate.
Principles:[17]
- Use a small needle - 22 gauge.
- Use minimal suction - aspiration per se is not the key; the sample is obtained by coring.
- Use minimal back and forth angulation - it destroys blood vessels
History:
- Popularized by the Swedes.[18]
Triage of specimens
At UHN the specimens are triaged. This is an uncommon practise in the world of cytopathology.
Options:
- Smear.
- Fancy (automated) thin layer preparations:
- Cytospin - centrifuged onto slide.
- ThinPrep - centrifuged onto filter then onto slide.
- Smear + IHC.
- Cell block. + IHC.
Triage of cytopathology specimens:
Triage of specimens | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Morphologic analysis | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abnormal | Normal | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lymphoid | Non-lymphoid | Unknown | Rest to morphology | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Management (liquid):
- Lymphoid:
- Fresh:
- Flow cytometry (FC) or laser scanning cytometry (LSC) if sufficient.
- Additional preps (i.e. CytoSpin) not usually useful.
- Fixed:
- Minimal material: smear + immunostains.
- Abundant material: cell block + immunostains.
- Fresh:
- Non-lymphoid:
- Cell block immunostains.
- Unknown:
- Minimal material: smear + immunostains, possibly cell block + immunostains.
- Abundant material: cell block + immunostains and flow cytometry.
Management (solid/clot):
- Cell block +/- immunostains.
Notes:
- It may be hard to diagnose large B cell lymphoma from LSC; thus, a cell block is useful if you have the material.[19]
- Abundant macrophages cause problems with LSC.[20]
- It is not worthwhile to do LSC if there is a scant amount of lymphoid tissue present in the specimen.[21]
- LSC is (usually) not done on CSF specimens with less than 7 mL of volume.[22]
Number of cells for LSC - calculation
Parameters
-- number of cells needed.
-- volume of sample.
-- est. volume of rapid assessment (RA).
-- est. rapid assessment (RA) area.
-- area with 20x obj. on microscope with 18 mm eye piece.
Rule
Application of rule
- Count cells in one field (on the microscope with the 18 mm eye piece) at 20x.
- Divide 167.36 cells ml by the volume of the sample.
- If the cell count in (1) is greater than the number of cells in (2) there are enough cells for a full panel.
Prepartions
Cost | Cells required | Fixation | Disadvantages/problems | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Smear | Minimal ~$5/slide | 1+ | Air dry/alcohol | Layering of cells |
CytoSpin | Expensive | 50 | ? | Expensive |
ThinPrep (liquid-based cytology) | Expensive ~$35/slide; intermediate for several slides |
300-400 | Always alcohol (methanol) | Filter damage at edge of prep. |
Sure-Path (liquid-based cytology) - see Note 1 | Expensive (?) | 300-400 (?) | Always alcohol (ethanol) | (?) |
Cell block | Expensive | >500 | Usually formulin | Expensive, loss of cells large, truncation artifact in FISH |
Laser scanning cytometry |
Expensive | ~50,000 for full B cell panel + minimal T cell panel - see Note 2 | None | Tissue needs to be fresh |
Note 1:
- Sure-Path (from TriPath) is not used at many teaching centres as it has some short coming for non-gyne specimens vis-a-vis ThinPrep (from Cytyc).[23]
- It is used by the private labs in Ontario and seems to be better for Pap tests.
- A comparison between SurePath and ThinPrep/experience from one lab in the USA is here: http://www.palpath.com/MedicalTestPages/papthin1.htm.
Note 2 - see lymphoma article for detailed description of markers:
- The typical "full" panel is:
- B-cell markers: CD10, CD19, CD20, CD23, FMC7, Kappa, Lambda.
- T-Cell markers: CD3, CD5, CD4, CD8, CD7, CD2.
- NK-Cell markers: CD56, CD16.
- Miscellaneous markers: CD11c, CD14.
Notes (general):
- CytoSpin used for CSF specimens.
Cytologic features
Large clusters
- Large clusters - fibrin (junk) vs. other:
- Small (~1/10 of RBC diameter) ovoid, purple staining (on Field stain) = platelets.
- If you see platelets think fibrin.
- Small (~1/10 of RBC diameter) ovoid, purple staining (on Field stain) = platelets.
Necrosis
- Blobs of acellular material.
- No nucleus or pyknosis of nucleus.
- Disrupted/frayed cellular membrane.
- Orangeophilic material (orange material) - on Pap stained material.
Granulomata
Histology (six features):[24]
- Foamy/bubbly cytoplasm, abundant - low power.
- Epithelioid morphology - cell borders near indistinct - key feature.
- "Footprint" pattern nuclei/bean-shaped nuclei - key feature.
- Macrophages usu. have an ovoid nucleus.
- +/-Nucleoli, small.
- +/-Fibrosis.
- +/-Pallisading at edge.
Notes:
- Granulomas are not always nice and round, as in non-cytology specimens.
Images:
DDx:
- Infectious:
- AFB:
- Tuberculosis.
- MAC.
- Fungal:
- Histoplasma.
- Bacterial:
- Bartonella (gram -ve) (Cat-scratch disease).[25]
- AFB:
Detail articles
Details are dealt with in separate articles.
Gynecologic cytopathology
Gynecologic cytopathology is the origins of cytopathology and still a large part of cytopathology practise. It is deal with in separate article.
CNS cytopathology
The above article deals with CNS cytopathology, i.e. lumbar puncture specimens.
Pulmonary cytopathology
The above article deals with pulmonary cytopathology, i.e. FNA specimens and sputum specimens.
Fluid from mesothelial-lined space cytopathology
The above article deals with cytopathology specimens from spaces lined with mesothelium.
Urine cytopathology
The above article deals with urine cytopathology.
Thyroid cytopathology
The above article deals with thyroid cytopathology.
Head & neck cytopathology
The above article deals with head and neck cytopathology, excluding thyroid cytopathology.
Breast cytopathology
The above article deals with breast cytopathology.
Grab bag of stuff
The following is a grab bag of stuff that is:
- Not covered in the above articles.
- Something that applies to multiple sites (e.g. melanoma).
Mediastinum
DDx:
- Teratoma and other germ cell tumours (GCTs).
- Seminoma/dysgerminoma is the most common.
- Terrible lymphoma.
- Thymoma.
- Mix of epithelial cells and small lymphoid cells.
- Thyroid.
- Metastasis.
Thymoma
Cytopathology
Features:[26]
- Mixed population of cells:
- Epithelial cells.
- Circular nuclei with well seen micronucleoli (seen at ~10X objective).
- +/-Nuclear membrane invaginations.
- Mature Lymphocytes.
- Epithelial cells.
DDx (pitfalls):
- Lymphoproliferative disorder (when epithelial component sparse).
- Carcinoma (when lymphoid population small).
- Should not have nuclear features of malignancy.
- Adenoca.: marked size variation, larger nucleoli.
- Squamous ca.: often no nucleoli. (???)
- Should not have nuclear features of malignancy.
Notes:
- May have necrosis.
- Should not mistake for granuloma... as nuclei of epithelial cells round not oval.
Image:
Germ cell tumours
Seminoma
Features:
- +/-"Corners" in the nuclear membrane.
- Cells cohesive.
- Central nucleus.
- Clear cytoplasm.
- Background with "viscous" or "tigroid" appearance on (air dried) Romanowsky type stains - key feature.
- Tigroid = striped or spotted appearance.[27]
- Related to the presence of glycogen.
- Tigroid pattern not seen on Pap stain.
- Not always seen.
- Tigroid = striped or spotted appearance.[27]
- +/-Small mature lymphocytes (common).
- +/-Granulomas.
Gastrointestinal
Liver
Normal:
- Liver cells may be binucleated.
- Hepatocytes:
- Abundant cytoplasm, central nucleus.
- Bile ductules between adjacent cells.
- +/-Yellow granular pigment (bile).
Hepatocellular carcinoma:
- Clusters of liver cells surrounded by endothelial cells.[28]
- +/-Nuclear atypia.
Notes:
- Low grade HCC is composed of cytologically normal appearing cells; the arrangement is what is diagnostic of malignancy.[28]
Cholangiocarcinoma:
- Looks like an adenocarcinoma:
- Eccentric nuclei, one nucleolus per cell, abundant cytoplasm, nuclear size var. cell-to-cell, irregular nuclear membrane, irregular/uneven chromatin pattern.
Common bile duct
Normal:
- Monolayer of small blue cells.
Notes:
- Caution is advised when calling malignancy in the setting of a stent or stones.
Adenocarcinoma
Features:
- Hyperchromasia.
- Pencil-shaped nuclei.
- Nuclear membrane irregularities.
Images:
Stomach
- May be difficult to distinguish from pancreas ductal epithelium.[29]
Small bowel
Epithelium:[29]
- Small blue cells.
- Goblet cells - key feature.
Notes:
- May appear to be similar to stomach and pancreatic duct.[29]
Esophagus
- Cytology may be done to look for candida.
- Report should comment on the presence of candida - if it is seen.
Kidney cytology
Renal oncocytoma
Features:[30]
- Moderate granular cytoplasm.
- Distinct cell borders.
- Round nuclei.
Image:
Oncocytoma vs chromophobe RCC:[30]
- ChRCC:
- Thicker cell borders.
- Perinuclear clearing/quasi koilocytic appearance.
Crystals in fluids
The above article covers gout, pseudogout and urine crystals.
Skin
Malignant melanoma
Classic features:
- Loosely cohesive cells and single cells.
- Mixure of epithelioid cells and spindle cells.
- Malignant cells have:
- Prominent red nucleolus.
- Pigmented cytoplasm - key feature (often not pigmented).
- Pigment may only be present in macrophages
- Occasional large binucleated cells (bug-eyed monster cell).
- Nuclei are often at opposite poles of the cell, i.e. the nuclei are as far apart as possible ("divorce cells").[31]
- Intranuclear inclusions.
- Pigmented macrophages (useful feature - but less specific for melanoma than pigment in malignant looking cells).
Notes:
- Large nucleolus - may Vaguely resemble adenocarcinoma.
- Prominent red nucleolus common in: serous carcinoma.
- The classic appearance of melanoma without pigment is closest to adenocarcinoma (which may have red nucleoli, large cells, abundant cytoplasm, occasional binucleation).
- Differentiating morphologic features: adenocarcinoma - 3-D clusters of cells, no spindle-shaped cells.
- Bug-eyed monster cells - may vaguely resemble a Reed-Sternberg cell (RSC) - diagnostic of Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL).
- RSCs do not have the granular cytoplasm typical of melanoma.
- Nuclei usually adjacent, i.e. not at opposite poles of the cell.
- Background of melanoma different than HL.
Images:
Bone marrow/vertebrae
Components:[32]
- One should see three lineages:
- Megakaryocytes.
- Large cells ~ 5-10X RBC.
- Eccentric nuclei.
- Erythrocyte precursor.
- Central nucleus.
- Chromatin - granular.
- One should see ejected nuclei of the same size.
- Granulocytes.
- Megakaryocytes.
- Fat.
- May be seen in a lymph node.
Notes:
- Megakaryocytes - reduced post-bone marrow transplant.
Short DDx:
- Plasma cell lesion, e.g. plasmacytoma.
- Carcinoma (metastatic).
- Lymphoma.
See also
References
- ↑ UHN Screening process. PCY50001.08.
- ↑ WG. 19 February 2010.
- ↑ WG. 6 January 2010.
- ↑ SM. 5 January 2010.
- ↑ SB. 27 January 2010.
- ↑ SM. 16 May 2008.
- ↑ URL: http://www.mesothelioma-peritoneum.info/. Accessed on: March 18, 2010.
- ↑ http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/121642912/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0
- ↑ Horobin RW, Walter KJ (1987). "Understanding Romanowsky staining. I: The Romanowsky-Giemsa effect in blood smears". Histochemistry 86 (3): 331–6. PMID 2437082. http://www.springerlink.com/content/r81x25451m841866/.
- ↑ Horobin RW, Walter KJ (1987). "Understanding Romanowsky staining. I: The Romanowsky-Giemsa effect in blood smears". Histochemistry 86 (3): 331–6. PMID 2437082. http://www.springerlink.com/content/r81x25451m841866/.
- ↑ Sapino A, Papotti M, Pietribiasi F, Bussolati G (September 1998). "Diagnostic cytological features of neuroendocrine differentiated carcinoma of the breast". Virchows Arch. 433 (3): 217–22.
- ↑ UHN PCY50001.08 P.11.
- ↑ UHN PCY50001.08 P.10.
- ↑ GR. 4 February 2010.
- ↑ GR. 4 February 2010.
- ↑ SB. 11 January 2010.
- ↑ SB. 11 January 2010.
- ↑ Diamantis A, Magiorkinis E, Koutselini H (2009). "Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy: historical aspects". Folia Histochem. Cytobiol. 47 (2): 191–7. doi:10.2478/v10042-009-0027-x. PMID 19995703. http://versita.metapress.com/content/p1p772662w5u373p/.
- ↑ WG. 16 February 2010.
- ↑ SB. March 8, 2010.
- ↑ SB. March 8, 2010.
- ↑ SB. March 11, 2010.
- ↑ SM. January 2010.
- ↑ GS. 26 January 2010.
- ↑ http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/781320-overview
- ↑ FNAC PP.203-4.
- ↑ URL: http://www.merriam-webster.com/medical/tigroid. Accessed on: January 4, 2010.
- ↑ 28.0 28.1 Lefkowitch, Jay H. (2006). Anatomic Pathology Board Review (1st ed.). Saunders. pp. 679. ISBN 978-1416025887.
- ↑ 29.0 29.1 29.2 Lefkowitch, Jay H. (2006). Anatomic Pathology Board Review (1st ed.). Saunders. pp. 680 (Q23). ISBN 978-1416025887.
- ↑ 30.0 30.1 Lefkowitch, Jay H. (2006). Anatomic Pathology Board Review (1st ed.). Saunders. pp. 683. ISBN 978-1416025887.
- ↑ GS. 24 February 2010.
- ↑ SB. 25 January 2010.