Difference between revisions of "Tissue loss"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
found. The missing tissue appears to have been lost during processing or it consisted of | found. The missing tissue appears to have been lost during processing or it consisted of | ||
material that is soluble in the processing fluids and dissolved. | material that is soluble in the processing fluids and dissolved. | ||
</pre> | |||
===No tissue at microscopy=== | |||
<pre> | |||
"Bladder tumor", biopsy: | |||
- No tissue is identified at microscopy (see comment) | |||
Comment: | |||
Three levels were examined. A re-biopsy should be considered | |||
within the clinical context. | |||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
Revision as of 19:04, 29 August 2014
In pathology, tissue loss is when a section at microscopy appears to represent less tissue then one could reasonably expect from the gross. It is relatively common in small biopsies.
It is estimated that approximately 27% of cases have a mismatch between the number of pieces seen at gross and microscopy.[1] A tissue gain is seen in approximately 25% of cases and a tissue loss is seen in approximately 7% of cases.[1]
This article also discusses tissue gain.
Possible cause of tissue gain
- Tissue fragmentation.
- Pseudofragmentation - two piece of tissue appears to be two in the plane of section.
- Tissue floater.
Work-up
- See tissue floater.
Possible causes of tissue loss
- Tissue floated from the slide.
- Material submitted is soluble in the processing medium, e.g. mucous.
Work-up
- Melt the tissue block to looking for the lost tissue.
Sign out
Tissue loss
The block (A1) was melted to look for the missing core tissue; however, no tissue was found. The missing tissue appears to have been lost during processing or it consisted of material that is soluble in the processing fluids and dissolved.
No tissue at microscopy
"Bladder tumor", biopsy: - No tissue is identified at microscopy (see comment) Comment: Three levels were examined. A re-biopsy should be considered within the clinical context.
See also
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Owens, SR.; Wiehagen, L.; Simmons, C.; Sikorova, A.; Stewart, W.; Kelly, S.; Nestler, R.; Yousem, SA. (Dec 2011). "Numerical fidelity of endoscopic biopsy fragments in the processing sequence of a university surgical pathology laboratory.". Arch Pathol Lab Med 135 (12): 1561-4. doi:10.5858/arpa.2011-0020-OA. PMID 22129184.