Pathology books - Revision history

Michael: /* Reference */

2014-12-29T16:08:02Z

Reference

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:08, 29 December 2014
Line 51:		Line 51:

	===Reference===		===Reference===
			{{Ref Lester3}}
			====Previous edition====
	{{Ref Lester}}		{{Ref Lester}}

Michael: /* Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease */

2014-12-29T16:01:17Z

Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:01, 29 December 2014
Line 15:		Line 15:

	===Reference===		===Reference===
	{{~~Ref_PBoD~~}}{{Ref_PBoD8}}		{{Ref PBoD9}}
			====Previous editions====
			{{Ref_PBoD8}}
			{{Ref_PBoD}}

	==Practice of Surgical Pathology==		==Practice of Surgical Pathology==

Michael: tweak

2014-12-29T02:20:13Z

tweak

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:20, 29 December 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Image:~~Icono_Normativa~~.~~png~~\|thumb\|right\|150px\|A book. (WC/Ex Bibliotheca Gymnasii Altonani)]]		[[Image:Bucheinband.15.Jh.r.Inkunabel.jpg\|thumb\|right\|150px\|A book. (WC/Ex Bibliotheca Gymnasii Altonani)]]
	'''Pathology books''' are numerous, and still found at almost every pathology conference. Some are good... many leave much to be desired. This article reviews some of them.		'''Pathology books''' are numerous, and still found at almost every pathology conference. Some are good... many leave much to be desired. This article reviews some of them.

Michael: tweak

2014-12-29T02:15:19Z

tweak

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:15, 29 December 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Pathology books''' are numerous. Some are good... many ~~are crap~~. This article reviews some of ~~'em~~.		[[Image:Icono_Normativa.png\|thumb\|right\|150px\|A book. (WC/Ex Bibliotheca Gymnasii Altonani)]]
			'''Pathology books''' are numerous, and still found at almost every pathology conference. Some are good... many leave much to be desired. This article reviews some of them.

	==Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease==		==Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease==
Line 33:		Line 34:

	===Cons===		===Cons===
	*The abbreviations ~~are~~ annoying.		*The abbreviations take getting use to/may be annoying.

	===Reference===		===Reference===
Line 44:		Line 45:
	===Cons===		===Cons===
	*The style suggested, for grossing, is wordy.		*The style suggested, for grossing, is wordy.
	*Checklists~~, [[IMHO]], would~~ be better.		*Checklists might be better.

	===Reference===		===Reference===
Line 71:		Line 72:

	==Pathology Recall==		==Pathology Recall==
	*Recommended by J.H.

	===Pros===		===Pros===
	*Covers the very basics... one saw in medical school.		*Covers the very basics... one saw in medical school.
Line 78:		Line 77:
	*Really only covers the stuff from medical school.		*Really only covers the stuff from medical school.
	*Written by non-pathology residents and reviewed by a staff pathologists.		*Written by non-pathology residents and reviewed by a staff pathologists.

	~~==Pathology Secrets==~~
	*Recommended by J.H.
	*M.S. thinks it isn't a good investment.

	==Anatomic pathology board review==		==Anatomic pathology board review==

Michael: /* Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease */

2014-10-26T03:00:50Z

Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:00, 26 October 2014
Line 3:		Line 3:
	==Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease==		==Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease==
	This the standard reference for pathology residents. It covers the bread & butter.		This the standard reference for pathology residents. It covers the bread & butter.
			Often referred to as ''Robbins''.

	===Pros===		===Pros===

Michael: /* Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease */

2014-09-13T19:31:16Z

Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:31, 13 September 2014
Line 9:		Line 9:

	===Cons===		===Cons===
	*Very wordy. Not particularly practical --when you're sitting in ~~from~~ of the [[microscope]].		*Very wordy. Not particularly practical --when you're sitting in front of the [[microscope]].
	*Very US-centric.		*Very US-centric.

Michael: /* Anatomic pathology board review */

2012-04-15T14:42:05Z

Anatomic pathology board review

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:42, 15 April 2012
Line 90:		Line 90:

	===Cons===		===Cons===
	*Emphasis on lots of nitty gritty... possibly not so useful for the [[FRCPC]] exam. ~~(???)~~		*Emphasis on lots of nitty gritty... possibly not so useful for the [[FRCPC]] exam.

	===Reference===		===Reference===

Michael: /* Washington Manual of Surgical Pathology */

2012-04-15T14:40:57Z

Washington Manual of Surgical Pathology

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:40, 15 April 2012
Line 54:		Line 54:

	===Cons===		===Cons===
	*Nice images are missing.		*Nice images (in the book) are missing.

	===Reference===		===Reference===

Michael: /* Diagnostic Criteria Handbook in Histopathology */

2012-04-15T14:40:21Z

Diagnostic Criteria Handbook in Histopathology

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:40, 15 April 2012
Line 29:		Line 29:

	===Pros===		===Pros===
	It covers most things.		*It covers most things.

	===Cons===		===Cons===

Michael: /* Pathology Secrets */

2011-09-18T17:10:11Z

Pathology Secrets

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:10, 18 September 2011
Line 81:		Line 81:
	*Recommended by J.H.		*Recommended by J.H.
	*M.S. thinks it isn't a good investment.		*M.S. thinks it isn't a good investment.

			==Anatomic pathology board review==
			*Written for pathology residents studying for the US board exam.
			*Consists of multiple choice questions with answers and explanations.

			===Pros===
			*Covers pretty much everything.

			===Cons===
			*Emphasis on lots of nitty gritty... possibly not so useful for the [[FRCPC]] exam. (???)

			===Reference===
			{{Ref APBR\|}}

	==Foundation series==		==Foundation series==