Doughnuts - Revision history

Michael at 21:30, 25 September 2023

2023-09-25T21:30:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:30, 25 September 2023
Line 27:		Line 27:
	*[[Donut cell]].		*[[Donut cell]].
	*[[Abdominoperineal resection grossing]].		*[[Abdominoperineal resection grossing]].
			*[[Pathology and food]].

	==References==		==References==

Michael: /* Pathology in donuts */

2017-01-03T17:08:13Z

Pathology in donuts

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:08, 3 January 2017
Line 8:		Line 8:

	==Pathology in donuts==		==Pathology in donuts==
	The value of assessing donuts in the context of ''lower anterior resections'' is questioned. A study of 125 individuals by Speake and Abercrombie found the pathologic ~~assessments~~ of donuts added nothing significant.<ref name=pmid12585627>{{Cite journal \| last1 = Speake \| first1 = WJ. \| last2 = Abercrombie \| first2 = JF. \| title = Should 'doughnut' histology be routinely performed following anterior resection for rectal cancer? \| journal = Ann R Coll Surg Engl \| volume = 85 \| issue = 1 \| pages = 26-7 \| month = Jan \| year = 2003 \| doi = \| PMID = 12585627 }}</ref> A larger study of 336 individuals by Ng ''et al.'' reached the same conclusion and noted that the cost of processing all those donuts by pathology costed over $60,000 (US dollars).<ref name=pmid24798632>{{Cite journal \| last1 = Ng \| first1 = CW. \| last2 = Lieske \| first2 = B. \| last3 = Tan \| first3 = KK. \| title = Routine histological sampling of doughnuts post oncologic anterior resection is not necessary. \| journal = Int J Colorectal Dis \| volume = 29 \| issue = 7 \| pages = 843-5 \| month = Jul \| year = 2014 \| doi = 10.1007/s00384-014-1886-y \| PMID = 24798632 }}</ref>		The value of assessing donuts in the context of ''lower anterior resections'' is questioned. A study of 125 individuals by Speake and Abercrombie found the pathologic assessment of donuts added nothing significant.<ref name=pmid12585627>{{Cite journal \| last1 = Speake \| first1 = WJ. \| last2 = Abercrombie \| first2 = JF. \| title = Should 'doughnut' histology be routinely performed following anterior resection for rectal cancer? \| journal = Ann R Coll Surg Engl \| volume = 85 \| issue = 1 \| pages = 26-7 \| month = Jan \| year = 2003 \| doi = \| PMID = 12585627 }}</ref> A larger study of 336 individuals by Ng ''et al.'' reached the same conclusion and noted that the cost of processing all those donuts by pathology costed over $60,000 (US dollars).<ref name=pmid24798632>{{Cite journal \| last1 = Ng \| first1 = CW. \| last2 = Lieske \| first2 = B. \| last3 = Tan \| first3 = KK. \| title = Routine histological sampling of doughnuts post oncologic anterior resection is not necessary. \| journal = Int J Colorectal Dis \| volume = 29 \| issue = 7 \| pages = 843-5 \| month = Jul \| year = 2014 \| doi = 10.1007/s00384-014-1886-y \| PMID = 24798632 }}</ref>

	==Sign out==		==Sign out==

Michael: /* Pathology in donuts */

2017-01-02T13:53:23Z

Pathology in donuts

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:53, 2 January 2017
Line 8:		Line 8:

	==Pathology in donuts==		==Pathology in donuts==
	The value of assessing donuts in the context of ''lower anterior resections'' is questioned. A study of 125 individuals by Speake and Abercrombie found the pathologic assessments of donuts added nothing significant.<ref name=pmid12585627>{{Cite journal \| last1 = Speake \| first1 = WJ. \| last2 = Abercrombie \| first2 = JF. \| title = Should 'doughnut' histology be routinely performed following anterior resection for rectal cancer? \| journal = Ann R Coll Surg Engl \| volume = 85 \| issue = 1 \| pages = 26-7 \| month = Jan \| year = 2003 \| doi = \| PMID = 12585627 }}</ref> A larger study of 336 individuals by Ng ''et al.'' reached the same conclusion and noted that the cost of processing all those donuts by pathology costed $61,~~017.60~~ (US dollars).<ref name=pmid24798632>{{Cite journal \| last1 = Ng \| first1 = CW. \| last2 = Lieske \| first2 = B. \| last3 = Tan \| first3 = KK. \| title = Routine histological sampling of doughnuts post oncologic anterior resection is not necessary. \| journal = Int J Colorectal Dis \| volume = 29 \| issue = 7 \| pages = 843-5 \| month = Jul \| year = 2014 \| doi = 10.1007/s00384-014-1886-y \| PMID = 24798632 }}</ref>		The value of assessing donuts in the context of ''lower anterior resections'' is questioned. A study of 125 individuals by Speake and Abercrombie found the pathologic assessments of donuts added nothing significant.<ref name=pmid12585627>{{Cite journal \| last1 = Speake \| first1 = WJ. \| last2 = Abercrombie \| first2 = JF. \| title = Should 'doughnut' histology be routinely performed following anterior resection for rectal cancer? \| journal = Ann R Coll Surg Engl \| volume = 85 \| issue = 1 \| pages = 26-7 \| month = Jan \| year = 2003 \| doi = \| PMID = 12585627 }}</ref> A larger study of 336 individuals by Ng ''et al.'' reached the same conclusion and noted that the cost of processing all those donuts by pathology costed over $60,000 (US dollars).<ref name=pmid24798632>{{Cite journal \| last1 = Ng \| first1 = CW. \| last2 = Lieske \| first2 = B. \| last3 = Tan \| first3 = KK. \| title = Routine histological sampling of doughnuts post oncologic anterior resection is not necessary. \| journal = Int J Colorectal Dis \| volume = 29 \| issue = 7 \| pages = 843-5 \| month = Jul \| year = 2014 \| doi = 10.1007/s00384-014-1886-y \| PMID = 24798632 }}</ref>

	==Sign out==		==Sign out==

Michael: /* Pathology in donuts */

2017-01-02T13:52:24Z

Pathology in donuts

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:52, 2 January 2017
Line 8:		Line 8:

	==Pathology in donuts==		==Pathology in donuts==
	The value of assessing donuts in the context of ''lower anterior resections'' is questioned. A study of 125 individuals by Speake and Abercrombie found ~~pathology~~ assessments of donuts added nothing significant.<ref name=pmid12585627>{{Cite journal \| last1 = Speake \| first1 = WJ. \| last2 = Abercrombie \| first2 = JF. \| title = Should 'doughnut' histology be routinely performed following anterior resection for rectal cancer? \| journal = Ann R Coll Surg Engl \| volume = 85 \| issue = 1 \| pages = 26-7 \| month = Jan \| year = 2003 \| doi = \| PMID = 12585627 }}</ref> A larger study of 336 individuals by Ng ''et al.'' reached the same conclusion and noted that the cost of processing all those donuts by pathology costed $61,017.60 (US dollars).<ref name=pmid24798632>{{Cite journal \| last1 = Ng \| first1 = CW. \| last2 = Lieske \| first2 = B. \| last3 = Tan \| first3 = KK. \| title = Routine histological sampling of doughnuts post oncologic anterior resection is not necessary. \| journal = Int J Colorectal Dis \| volume = 29 \| issue = 7 \| pages = 843-5 \| month = Jul \| year = 2014 \| doi = 10.1007/s00384-014-1886-y \| PMID = 24798632 }}</ref>		The value of assessing donuts in the context of ''lower anterior resections'' is questioned. A study of 125 individuals by Speake and Abercrombie found the pathologic assessments of donuts added nothing significant.<ref name=pmid12585627>{{Cite journal \| last1 = Speake \| first1 = WJ. \| last2 = Abercrombie \| first2 = JF. \| title = Should 'doughnut' histology be routinely performed following anterior resection for rectal cancer? \| journal = Ann R Coll Surg Engl \| volume = 85 \| issue = 1 \| pages = 26-7 \| month = Jan \| year = 2003 \| doi = \| PMID = 12585627 }}</ref> A larger study of 336 individuals by Ng ''et al.'' reached the same conclusion and noted that the cost of processing all those donuts by pathology costed $61,017.60 (US dollars).<ref name=pmid24798632>{{Cite journal \| last1 = Ng \| first1 = CW. \| last2 = Lieske \| first2 = B. \| last3 = Tan \| first3 = KK. \| title = Routine histological sampling of doughnuts post oncologic anterior resection is not necessary. \| journal = Int J Colorectal Dis \| volume = 29 \| issue = 7 \| pages = 843-5 \| month = Jul \| year = 2014 \| doi = 10.1007/s00384-014-1886-y \| PMID = 24798632 }}</ref>

	==Sign out==		==Sign out==

Michael: /* Pathology in donuts */

2017-01-02T13:51:47Z

Pathology in donuts

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:51, 2 January 2017
Line 8:		Line 8:

	==Pathology in donuts==		==Pathology in donuts==
	The value of assessing donuts in the context of ''lower anterior resections'' is questioned. A study of 125 individuals by Speake and Abercrombie found pathology assessments of donuts added nothing significant.<ref name=pmid12585627>{{Cite journal \| last1 = Speake \| first1 = WJ. \| last2 = Abercrombie \| first2 = JF. \| title = Should 'doughnut' histology be routinely performed following anterior resection for rectal cancer? \| journal = Ann R Coll Surg Engl \| volume = 85 \| issue = 1 \| pages = 26-7 \| month = Jan \| year = 2003 \| doi = \| PMID = 12585627 }}</ref> A larger study of 336 individuals by Ng ''et al.'' reached the same conclusion and noted that the cost of processing all those donuts by pathology costed ~~USD~~$61,017.60.<ref name=pmid24798632>{{Cite journal \| last1 = Ng \| first1 = CW. \| last2 = Lieske \| first2 = B. \| last3 = Tan \| first3 = KK. \| title = Routine histological sampling of doughnuts post oncologic anterior resection is not necessary. \| journal = Int J Colorectal Dis \| volume = 29 \| issue = 7 \| pages = 843-5 \| month = Jul \| year = 2014 \| doi = 10.1007/s00384-014-1886-y \| PMID = 24798632 }}</ref>		The value of assessing donuts in the context of ''lower anterior resections'' is questioned. A study of 125 individuals by Speake and Abercrombie found pathology assessments of donuts added nothing significant.<ref name=pmid12585627>{{Cite journal \| last1 = Speake \| first1 = WJ. \| last2 = Abercrombie \| first2 = JF. \| title = Should 'doughnut' histology be routinely performed following anterior resection for rectal cancer? \| journal = Ann R Coll Surg Engl \| volume = 85 \| issue = 1 \| pages = 26-7 \| month = Jan \| year = 2003 \| doi = \| PMID = 12585627 }}</ref> A larger study of 336 individuals by Ng ''et al.'' reached the same conclusion and noted that the cost of processing all those donuts by pathology costed $61,017.60 (US dollars).<ref name=pmid24798632>{{Cite journal \| last1 = Ng \| first1 = CW. \| last2 = Lieske \| first2 = B. \| last3 = Tan \| first3 = KK. \| title = Routine histological sampling of doughnuts post oncologic anterior resection is not necessary. \| journal = Int J Colorectal Dis \| volume = 29 \| issue = 7 \| pages = 843-5 \| month = Jul \| year = 2014 \| doi = 10.1007/s00384-014-1886-y \| PMID = 24798632 }}</ref>

	==Sign out==		==Sign out==

Michael at 13:50, 2 January 2017

2017-01-02T13:50:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:50, 2 January 2017
Line 8:		Line 8:

	==Pathology in donuts==		==Pathology in donuts==
	The value of assessing donuts in the context of ''lower anterior resections'' is questioned. A study of 125 individuals by Speake and Abercrombie found donuts added nothing significant.<ref name=pmid12585627>{{Cite journal \| last1 = Speake \| first1 = WJ. \| last2 = Abercrombie \| first2 = JF. \| title = Should 'doughnut' histology be routinely performed following anterior resection for rectal cancer? \| journal = Ann R Coll Surg Engl \| volume = 85 \| issue = 1 \| pages = 26-7 \| month = Jan \| year = 2003 \| doi = \| PMID = 12585627 }}</ref> A larger study of 336 individuals by Ng ''et al.'' reached the same conclusion and noted that the cost of processing ~~the~~ donuts ~~was~~ USD$61,017.60.<ref name=pmid24798632>{{Cite journal \| last1 = Ng \| first1 = CW. \| last2 = Lieske \| first2 = B. \| last3 = Tan \| first3 = KK. \| title = Routine histological sampling of doughnuts post oncologic anterior resection is not necessary. \| journal = Int J Colorectal Dis \| volume = 29 \| issue = 7 \| pages = 843-5 \| month = Jul \| year = 2014 \| doi = 10.1007/s00384-014-1886-y \| PMID = 24798632 }}</ref>		The value of assessing donuts in the context of ''lower anterior resections'' is questioned. A study of 125 individuals by Speake and Abercrombie found pathology assessments of donuts added nothing significant.<ref name=pmid12585627>{{Cite journal \| last1 = Speake \| first1 = WJ. \| last2 = Abercrombie \| first2 = JF. \| title = Should 'doughnut' histology be routinely performed following anterior resection for rectal cancer? \| journal = Ann R Coll Surg Engl \| volume = 85 \| issue = 1 \| pages = 26-7 \| month = Jan \| year = 2003 \| doi = \| PMID = 12585627 }}</ref> A larger study of 336 individuals by Ng ''et al.'' reached the same conclusion and noted that the cost of processing all those donuts by pathology costed USD$61,017.60.<ref name=pmid24798632>{{Cite journal \| last1 = Ng \| first1 = CW. \| last2 = Lieske \| first2 = B. \| last3 = Tan \| first3 = KK. \| title = Routine histological sampling of doughnuts post oncologic anterior resection is not necessary. \| journal = Int J Colorectal Dis \| volume = 29 \| issue = 7 \| pages = 843-5 \| month = Jul \| year = 2014 \| doi = 10.1007/s00384-014-1886-y \| PMID = 24798632 }}</ref>

	==Sign out==		==Sign out==

Michael at 13:47, 2 January 2017

2017-01-02T13:47:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:47, 2 January 2017
Line 6:		Line 6:

	CEEA staplers are particularly useful in low lying tumours; they allow more individuals to safely have a [[lower anterior resection]] instead of the less desirable [[abdominoperineal resection]] (APR).<ref name=pmid3728802>{{Cite journal \| last1 = Trollope \| first1 = ML. \| last2 = Cohen \| first2 = RG. \| last3 = Lee \| first3 = RH. \| last4 = Cannon \| first4 = WB. \| last5 = Marzoni \| first5 = FA. \| last6 = Cressman \| first6 = RD. \| title = A 7 year experience with low anterior sigmoid resections using the EEA stapler. \| journal = Am J Surg \| volume = 152 \| issue = 1 \| pages = 11-5 \| month = Jul \| year = 1986 \| doi = \| PMID = 3728802 }}</ref>		CEEA staplers are particularly useful in low lying tumours; they allow more individuals to safely have a [[lower anterior resection]] instead of the less desirable [[abdominoperineal resection]] (APR).<ref name=pmid3728802>{{Cite journal \| last1 = Trollope \| first1 = ML. \| last2 = Cohen \| first2 = RG. \| last3 = Lee \| first3 = RH. \| last4 = Cannon \| first4 = WB. \| last5 = Marzoni \| first5 = FA. \| last6 = Cressman \| first6 = RD. \| title = A 7 year experience with low anterior sigmoid resections using the EEA stapler. \| journal = Am J Surg \| volume = 152 \| issue = 1 \| pages = 11-5 \| month = Jul \| year = 1986 \| doi = \| PMID = 3728802 }}</ref>

			==Pathology in donuts==
			The value of assessing donuts in the context of ''lower anterior resections'' is questioned. A study of 125 individuals by Speake and Abercrombie found donuts added nothing significant.<ref name=pmid12585627>{{Cite journal \| last1 = Speake \| first1 = WJ. \| last2 = Abercrombie \| first2 = JF. \| title = Should 'doughnut' histology be routinely performed following anterior resection for rectal cancer? \| journal = Ann R Coll Surg Engl \| volume = 85 \| issue = 1 \| pages = 26-7 \| month = Jan \| year = 2003 \| doi = \| PMID = 12585627 }}</ref> A larger study of 336 individuals by Ng ''et al.'' reached the same conclusion and noted that the cost of processing the donuts was USD$61,017.60.<ref name=pmid24798632>{{Cite journal \| last1 = Ng \| first1 = CW. \| last2 = Lieske \| first2 = B. \| last3 = Tan \| first3 = KK. \| title = Routine histological sampling of doughnuts post oncologic anterior resection is not necessary. \| journal = Int J Colorectal Dis \| volume = 29 \| issue = 7 \| pages = 843-5 \| month = Jul \| year = 2014 \| doi = 10.1007/s00384-014-1886-y \| PMID = 24798632 }}</ref>

	==Sign out==		==Sign out==

Michael at 13:39, 2 January 2017

2017-01-02T13:39:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:39, 2 January 2017
Line 5:		Line 5:
	''CEEA'' is ''circular end-to-end anastomosis''. ''EEA'' is trademarked. Presumably, it is an abbreviation for ''end-to-end anastomosis''.		''CEEA'' is ''circular end-to-end anastomosis''. ''EEA'' is trademarked. Presumably, it is an abbreviation for ''end-to-end anastomosis''.

	CEEA staplers are particularly useful in low lying tumours; they allow more individuals to safely have a lower anterior resection instead of the less desirable [[abdominoperineal resection]] (APR).<ref name=pmid3728802>{{Cite journal \| last1 = Trollope \| first1 = ML. \| last2 = Cohen \| first2 = RG. \| last3 = Lee \| first3 = RH. \| last4 = Cannon \| first4 = WB. \| last5 = Marzoni \| first5 = FA. \| last6 = Cressman \| first6 = RD. \| title = A 7 year experience with low anterior sigmoid resections using the EEA stapler. \| journal = Am J Surg \| volume = 152 \| issue = 1 \| pages = 11-5 \| month = Jul \| year = 1986 \| doi = \| PMID = 3728802 }}</ref>		CEEA staplers are particularly useful in low lying tumours; they allow more individuals to safely have a [[lower anterior resection]] instead of the less desirable [[abdominoperineal resection]] (APR).<ref name=pmid3728802>{{Cite journal \| last1 = Trollope \| first1 = ML. \| last2 = Cohen \| first2 = RG. \| last3 = Lee \| first3 = RH. \| last4 = Cannon \| first4 = WB. \| last5 = Marzoni \| first5 = FA. \| last6 = Cressman \| first6 = RD. \| title = A 7 year experience with low anterior sigmoid resections using the EEA stapler. \| journal = Am J Surg \| volume = 152 \| issue = 1 \| pages = 11-5 \| month = Jul \| year = 1986 \| doi = \| PMID = 3728802 }}</ref>

	==Sign out==		==Sign out==

Michael at 13:39, 2 January 2017

2017-01-02T13:39:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:39, 2 January 2017
Line 5:		Line 5:
	''CEEA'' is ''circular end-to-end anastomosis''. ''EEA'' is trademarked. Presumably, it is an abbreviation for ''end-to-end anastomosis''.		''CEEA'' is ''circular end-to-end anastomosis''. ''EEA'' is trademarked. Presumably, it is an abbreviation for ''end-to-end anastomosis''.

	CEEA staplers are particularly useful in low lying tumours; they allow more individuals to safely have a lower anterior resection instead of the less desirable abdominoperineal resection (APR).<ref name=pmid3728802>{{Cite journal \| last1 = Trollope \| first1 = ML. \| last2 = Cohen \| first2 = RG. \| last3 = Lee \| first3 = RH. \| last4 = Cannon \| first4 = WB. \| last5 = Marzoni \| first5 = FA. \| last6 = Cressman \| first6 = RD. \| title = A 7 year experience with low anterior sigmoid resections using the EEA stapler. \| journal = Am J Surg \| volume = 152 \| issue = 1 \| pages = 11-5 \| month = Jul \| year = 1986 \| doi = \| PMID = 3728802 }}</ref>		CEEA staplers are particularly useful in low lying tumours; they allow more individuals to safely have a lower anterior resection instead of the less desirable [[abdominoperineal resection]] (APR).<ref name=pmid3728802>{{Cite journal \| last1 = Trollope \| first1 = ML. \| last2 = Cohen \| first2 = RG. \| last3 = Lee \| first3 = RH. \| last4 = Cannon \| first4 = WB. \| last5 = Marzoni \| first5 = FA. \| last6 = Cressman \| first6 = RD. \| title = A 7 year experience with low anterior sigmoid resections using the EEA stapler. \| journal = Am J Surg \| volume = 152 \| issue = 1 \| pages = 11-5 \| month = Jul \| year = 1986 \| doi = \| PMID = 3728802 }}</ref>

	==Sign out==		==Sign out==

Michael: /* See also */

2017-01-02T13:38:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:38, 2 January 2017
Line 23:		Line 23:
	*[[Rectum]].		*[[Rectum]].
	*[[Donut cell]].		*[[Donut cell]].
			*[[Abdominoperineal resection grossing]].

	==References==		==References==