<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://librepathology.org/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=CAP_Molecular_Diagnosis_of_Lung_Cancer</id>
	<title>CAP Molecular Diagnosis of Lung Cancer - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://librepathology.org/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=CAP_Molecular_Diagnosis_of_Lung_Cancer"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://librepathology.org/w/index.php?title=CAP_Molecular_Diagnosis_of_Lung_Cancer&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-09-12T18:46:55Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.9</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://librepathology.org/w/index.php?title=CAP_Molecular_Diagnosis_of_Lung_Cancer&amp;diff=39156&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Tate: Created page with &quot; {{hidden|List 5 treatment defining molecular transformation, the neoplasm, and the genetic alteration|1. 100% of CML: BRR-ABL &gt; Imatinib, 2. 20% of Lung Adenocarcinoma: EGFR...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://librepathology.org/w/index.php?title=CAP_Molecular_Diagnosis_of_Lung_Cancer&amp;diff=39156&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2015-08-12T13:27:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot; {{hidden|List 5 treatment defining molecular transformation, the neoplasm, and the genetic alteration|1. 100% of CML: BRR-ABL &amp;gt; Imatinib, 2. 20% of Lung Adenocarcinoma: EGFR...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{hidden|List 5 treatment defining molecular transformation, the neoplasm, and the genetic alteration|1. 100% of CML: BRR-ABL &amp;gt; Imatinib, 2. 20% of Lung Adenocarcinoma: EGFR &amp;gt; Erlotinib/Gefitinib, 3. 25% Infiltrative ductal carcinoma of breast HER2&amp;gt;Trastuzumab, 4. 50% of Melanoma, BRAF v600E &amp;gt; PLX4032, 5. 4% of Lung Adenocarcinoma: ALK &amp;gt; Crizotinib}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{hidden|List and describe 5 areas of Genetic characaterization of tumours for personalized medicine|DNA mutations, DNA chromosomal alterations, mRNA and MiRNA profiling, Proteomics, DNA epigenetics}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{hidden|What fraction of Lung adenocarcinomas have no known detactable mutations|42%}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{hidden|What are the three most common molecular alterations of Lung Adenocarcinoma|KRAS 23%, EGFR 15%, TP53 5%}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{hidden|What is the two most common molecular alteration makes patients with EGFR mutations resistant to targetted therapies?|KRAS (primary) and T790M (primary and acquired)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{hidden|List two EGFR kinase inhibitors.|Gefitinib/Iressa, Erlotinib/Tarceva}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{hidden|What are the three most common cancers associated with KRAS mutations?|Pancreatic 90%, Colon 50%, Lung NSCLC 30%}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{hidden|Why don&amp;#039;t KRAS + tumours respond to Anti EGFR therapies?|KRAS is downstream from EGFR, so changing the function of EFGR would not have any effect on mutated KRAS}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{hidden|Explain the cost effectiveness of genetic testing for targetted therapies?|Most molecular tests cost $200-1000, vs one month of targetted therapy $2000-10000/month}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{hidden|What are the three most common cancers associated with BRAF mutations?|Melanoma 70%, Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma 50%, Ovarian serious carcinoma 30%, Colon cancer 10%, Hint Papillary architecture}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{hidden|Beta catenin/CTNNB1 expression is found with which histological pattern of lung adenocarcinoma?|Low grade adenocarcinoma of fetal type, poor px, &amp;lt;40yo, and has glycogen rich glandular formations, may occur in FAP patients}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{hidden|What is the most common ALK rearrangement found in NSCLC?|EML4-ALK (90% of the 13% of lung cancers found to due to ALK fusions)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{hidden|List some pros and cons of ALK FISH.|Pros: commercial FDA approved probes available, not too expensive, moderately easy to disseminate screening, clinically validated, and failed tests on poorly preserved tissues are not reported as negative. Cons: need fish lab expertise (including pathologist and PhD), can be tricky if genes are close}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{hidden|List some pros and cons of ALK IHC.|Pros: fast, cheap, easy to disseminate screening, Cons: commercial antibodies sub-optimal, poorly preserved tissues (esp bx) may give false negative results due to loss of antigenicity, no internal control}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{hidden|What is a positive count in the ALK-FISH?|Signal split &amp;gt;2 probe diameters}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tate</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>